<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peter King&#8217;s Loose Lips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/03/peter-kings-loose-lips/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/03/peter-kings-loose-lips</link>
	<description>Watching The New England Sports Media</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  1 Dec 2008 20:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/03/peter-kings-loose-lips#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/03/peter-kings-loose-lips#comment-280</guid>
		<description>To Mike W - that's a great post!  

I didn't hear the interview but I can just imagine is drippy over the top hyperbole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Mike W - that&#8217;s a great post!  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t hear the interview but I can just imagine is drippy over the top hyperbole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike W</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/03/peter-kings-loose-lips#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/03/peter-kings-loose-lips#comment-277</guid>
		<description>REPORTERS-LEAKING-IMPORTANT-INFORMATION-ABOUT-U.S.-MILITARY-OPERATIONS-GATE!

Join us for the next nine months as we investigate the deep-seated problems about American sportswriters giving away vital information about our military operations.  How much are they revealing?  Is this radio interview it?  Should we just accept that it is?  Or is it more?  Are certain sports reporters working for the terrorists?  How deep does this run?  How many vague, unsubstantiated "thoughts" can we offer?

When will Arlen Specter get involved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REPORTERS-LEAKING-IMPORTANT-INFORMATION-ABOUT-U.S.-MILITARY-OPERATIONS-GATE!</p>
<p>Join us for the next nine months as we investigate the deep-seated problems about American sportswriters giving away vital information about our military operations.  How much are they revealing?  Is this radio interview it?  Should we just accept that it is?  Or is it more?  Are certain sports reporters working for the terrorists?  How deep does this run?  How many vague, unsubstantiated &#8220;thoughts&#8221; can we offer?</p>
<p>When will Arlen Specter get involved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/03/peter-kings-loose-lips#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/03/peter-kings-loose-lips#comment-276</guid>
		<description>King's appearance was cringe inducing.  Not only did give out names and hometowns of soldiers, but his tone, in my opinion, was a little creepy for a non-combatant.  He talked about individual soldiers' kills in a manner that seemed inapt.  It was cold, like he was reveling in the death of another human being.  His tone was just wrong, something I don't think the soldiers he was discussing would ever think of adopting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>King&#8217;s appearance was cringe inducing.  Not only did give out names and hometowns of soldiers, but his tone, in my opinion, was a little creepy for a non-combatant.  He talked about individual soldiers&#8217; kills in a manner that seemed inapt.  It was cold, like he was reveling in the death of another human being.  His tone was just wrong, something I don&#8217;t think the soldiers he was discussing would ever think of adopting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
