<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Rams Walkthrough Tape: Will Media Backtrack on Pats?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats</link>
	<description>Watching The New England Sports Media</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DaveR</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2187</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2187</guid>
		<description>Mike Fish has been speculating in print and calling it a "news" story in every single thing he's written on the issue for ESPN.  Remember his "how many draft picks will the Patriots lose based on the information that we'll &lt;i&gt;just go ahead and assume&lt;/i&gt; that Walsh has?  Ten? Fifty? A zillion?" article when Walsh first appeared on the scene?  

If not, &lt;a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3226465" rel="nofollow"&gt;let me remind you.&lt;/a&gt;

One of the more terrible "journalists" at an increasingly terrible "news" outlet, that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Fish has been speculating in print and calling it a &#8220;news&#8221; story in every single thing he&#8217;s written on the issue for ESPN.  Remember his &#8220;how many draft picks will the Patriots lose based on the information that we&#8217;ll <i>just go ahead and assume</i> that Walsh has?  Ten? Fifty? A zillion?&#8221; article when Walsh first appeared on the scene?  </p>
<p>If not, <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3226465" rel="nofollow">let me remind you.</a></p>
<p>One of the more terrible &#8220;journalists&#8221; at an increasingly terrible &#8220;news&#8221; outlet, that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2150</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2150</guid>
		<description>Apparently, ESPN is COMPLETELY UNWILLING to let this story die.

Mike Fish is speculating that somehow these tapes still imply that Belichick and the NFL have not come clean; and the idiots on their morning TV show this morning were speculating on the existence of another, as yet unnamed videographer who probably DID tape the Rams' walkthrough (I mean, if it's not Walsh, then it MUST BE SOMEBODY ELSE WHO DID IT!!!!).

I have a journalism degree. I never went into the field primarily because I didn't really like it all that much and I also didn't want to be significantly outnumbered in every newsroom in which I worked (hint: I don't vote Democrat).

But aside from all of the political propaganda that my journalism profs. tried to force upon me during my 4 years in college, they DID force home the point, again and again and again, that you simply must have your facts straight. Moreover, they stressed that you MUST get corroboration from at least one other person if you're going to write a story citing "unnamed sources"; and above all else, you CANNOT SPECULATE in print and then call it a "news" story.

The even said that columnists, who get paid for their opinions, had to write based on facts, and couldn't just speculate and make up stories for drama, attention and effect.

I graduated 20 years ago. Journalism even then was a vocation that was heavily criticized by the American public; I can't imagine that today, any average American has any respect left for that so-called "profession."

Spygate represents American journalism at its absolute worst.....sadly, I doubt things are going to get any better any time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, ESPN is COMPLETELY UNWILLING to let this story die.</p>
<p>Mike Fish is speculating that somehow these tapes still imply that Belichick and the NFL have not come clean; and the idiots on their morning TV show this morning were speculating on the existence of another, as yet unnamed videographer who probably DID tape the Rams&#8217; walkthrough (I mean, if it&#8217;s not Walsh, then it MUST BE SOMEBODY ELSE WHO DID IT!!!!).</p>
<p>I have a journalism degree. I never went into the field primarily because I didn&#8217;t really like it all that much and I also didn&#8217;t want to be significantly outnumbered in every newsroom in which I worked (hint: I don&#8217;t vote Democrat).</p>
<p>But aside from all of the political propaganda that my journalism profs. tried to force upon me during my 4 years in college, they DID force home the point, again and again and again, that you simply must have your facts straight. Moreover, they stressed that you MUST get corroboration from at least one other person if you&#8217;re going to write a story citing &#8220;unnamed sources&#8221;; and above all else, you CANNOT SPECULATE in print and then call it a &#8220;news&#8221; story.</p>
<p>The even said that columnists, who get paid for their opinions, had to write based on facts, and couldn&#8217;t just speculate and make up stories for drama, attention and effect.</p>
<p>I graduated 20 years ago. Journalism even then was a vocation that was heavily criticized by the American public; I can&#8217;t imagine that today, any average American has any respect left for that so-called &#8220;profession.&#8221;</p>
<p>Spygate represents American journalism at its absolute worst&#8230;..sadly, I doubt things are going to get any better any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2147</guid>
		<description>Can we get an official fire Tomase boycott the Herald petition going on this website? I hope the faithful readers of this site agree that Tomase and the Herald owe all of New England an explanation about the wheres and the whys of the walk through story. Bob Kraft on the off chance that you are reading this, please don't let this die down quietly sue Tomase and the Herald into homelessness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we get an official fire Tomase boycott the Herald petition going on this website? I hope the faithful readers of this site agree that Tomase and the Herald owe all of New England an explanation about the wheres and the whys of the walk through story. Bob Kraft on the off chance that you are reading this, please don&#8217;t let this die down quietly sue Tomase and the Herald into homelessness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edmund dantes</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator>edmund dantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2146</guid>
		<description>Oh they are covering it, but they are blaming the Herald for forcing them to spout off about Spygate since February. On Mike and Mike the tone was very much "how is the herald going to apologize to us? We're the idiots that took a single sourced anonymous story and ran with it. We never once thought to actual do some journalism of our own to track down the story. We just all reported on the reporting that was reporting on the report."

I'm guessing the tone is going to be generally of that ilk. How the Herald screwed them all over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh they are covering it, but they are blaming the Herald for forcing them to spout off about Spygate since February. On Mike and Mike the tone was very much &#8220;how is the herald going to apologize to us? We&#8217;re the idiots that took a single sourced anonymous story and ran with it. We never once thought to actual do some journalism of our own to track down the story. We just all reported on the reporting that was reporting on the report.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing the tone is going to be generally of that ilk. How the Herald screwed them all over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2145</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2145</guid>
		<description>Gary - I was driving home just before 6 p.m. and the hosts and caller were talking about how there are a lot of good blogs, but a lot of them contribute to the dumbing down of sports fans. I'm sorry, but nothing in Massachusetts is a bigger contributor to the dumbing down of sports fans than WEEI and some of the idiots they employ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary - I was driving home just before 6 p.m. and the hosts and caller were talking about how there are a lot of good blogs, but a lot of them contribute to the dumbing down of sports fans. I&#8217;m sorry, but nothing in Massachusetts is a bigger contributor to the dumbing down of sports fans than WEEI and some of the idiots they employ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>Just because Walsh was not the source for Tomase's story doesn't mean the walkthrough tape does not exist. Now, I think that if the tape did exist, Walsh would at least know about it and would come out and say that, but it is certainly at least possible that it exists.

Let me go on record as saying I do not think the tape exists and I am just playing devil's advocate here, but I thought it was worth pointing out the possibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because Walsh was not the source for Tomase&#8217;s story doesn&#8217;t mean the walkthrough tape does not exist. Now, I think that if the tape did exist, Walsh would at least know about it and would come out and say that, but it is certainly at least possible that it exists.</p>
<p>Let me go on record as saying I do not think the tape exists and I am just playing devil&#8217;s advocate here, but I thought it was worth pointing out the possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2143</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2008/05/no-rams-walkthrough-tape-will-media-backtrack-on-pats#comment-2143</guid>
		<description>How about the blowhards in the afternoon on EEI talking smack about bloggers. Time to declare war on the hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the blowhards in the afternoon on EEI talking smack about bloggers. Time to declare war on the hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
