<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steeler Coronation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/02/steeler-coronation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/02/steeler-coronation</link>
	<description>Watching The New England Sports Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:19:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/02/steeler-coronation#comment-9255</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=4275#comment-9255</guid>
		<description>And given that it&#039;s Borges, if anyone brings it up to him, he&#039;ll deny he was wrong about it and come up with some reason why he was actually right (still waiting for him to admit that he was wrong about the Richard Seymour pick in the 2001 draft).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And given that it&#8217;s Borges, if anyone brings it up to him, he&#8217;ll deny he was wrong about it and come up with some reason why he was actually right (still waiting for him to admit that he was wrong about the Richard Seymour pick in the 2001 draft).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Old Bastard</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/02/steeler-coronation#comment-9247</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Old Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=4275#comment-9247</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still waiting for the Colts Dynasty the media kept predicting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for the Colts Dynasty the media kept predicting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Old Bastard</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/02/steeler-coronation#comment-9246</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Old Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=4275#comment-9246</guid>
		<description>So Ron Borges has the Steelers winning it again next year?....typical sportswriter CRAPOLA...goes like this, Sports hack makes a &quot;bold prediction&quot; A YEAR IN ADVANCE knowing full well a year from now NOBODY will remember what he wrote...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Ron Borges has the Steelers winning it again next year?&#8230;.typical sportswriter CRAPOLA&#8230;goes like this, Sports hack makes a &#8220;bold prediction&#8221; A YEAR IN ADVANCE knowing full well a year from now NOBODY will remember what he wrote&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/02/steeler-coronation#comment-9241</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=4275#comment-9241</guid>
		<description>You pretty much nailed it.

The presence of the &quot;evil&quot; Belichick is probably reason #1 why many media types were reluctant to give the Pats enough credit after their first two Super Bowl wins, and because it was Belichick, and not Tony Dungy or any other coach the media likes, Spygate became a hugely overblown issue, and also provided a crutch for Belichick (and Patriots) haters in the media and elsewhere to discredit everything they had accomplished prior to that.

Funny how, like I said before, none of these articles praising the Steelers from head to toe after Sunday&#039;s game mentions their Steroid abuse in the 70s (before it was that common across the league) or the PED-supplying allegations against their ex-team doctor, who just left the team recently. Heck, there are Steelers&#039; fans trolling Patriots boards this very minute saying that all of the Steelers&#039; titles are &quot;legitimate&quot; while calling all of the Pats&#039; titles fake or unearned because of Spygate. It&#039;s truly amazing how provincial loyalty can cause such tunnel vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pretty much nailed it.</p>
<p>The presence of the &#8220;evil&#8221; Belichick is probably reason #1 why many media types were reluctant to give the Pats enough credit after their first two Super Bowl wins, and because it was Belichick, and not Tony Dungy or any other coach the media likes, Spygate became a hugely overblown issue, and also provided a crutch for Belichick (and Patriots) haters in the media and elsewhere to discredit everything they had accomplished prior to that.</p>
<p>Funny how, like I said before, none of these articles praising the Steelers from head to toe after Sunday&#8217;s game mentions their Steroid abuse in the 70s (before it was that common across the league) or the PED-supplying allegations against their ex-team doctor, who just left the team recently. Heck, there are Steelers&#8217; fans trolling Patriots boards this very minute saying that all of the Steelers&#8217; titles are &#8220;legitimate&#8221; while calling all of the Pats&#8217; titles fake or unearned because of Spygate. It&#8217;s truly amazing how provincial loyalty can cause such tunnel vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/02/steeler-coronation#comment-9240</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=4275#comment-9240</guid>
		<description>I think the media was simply cautious with the Pats because they had such a quick turnaround and after their 1st SB win, they missed the playoffs. The Steelers had a lot of previous success and have always been regarded among the elite franchises in the NFL. Of course I agree that the media anoints teams too early, but what do you expect? They do it all the time. As for the Patriot hate, that&#039;s entirely on the media&#039;s hatred for BB. Spygate wouldn&#039;t have been a big deal if Tony Dungy was the coach.

The Manning brothers and The Steelers have won the last 4 Super Bowls...now that is a tough pill to swallow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the media was simply cautious with the Pats because they had such a quick turnaround and after their 1st SB win, they missed the playoffs. The Steelers had a lot of previous success and have always been regarded among the elite franchises in the NFL. Of course I agree that the media anoints teams too early, but what do you expect? They do it all the time. As for the Patriot hate, that&#8217;s entirely on the media&#8217;s hatred for BB. Spygate wouldn&#8217;t have been a big deal if Tony Dungy was the coach.</p>
<p>The Manning brothers and The Steelers have won the last 4 Super Bowls&#8230;now that is a tough pill to swallow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/02/steeler-coronation#comment-9239</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=4275#comment-9239</guid>
		<description>Yet another reason to ignore the NFL media this off-season.  They&#039;re all falling over themselves (and whipping out the thesaurus) in trying to out-superlative the next guy.

Hey, it was a fun game to watch.  Nothing else.    

Cannot wait for the Brett Favre watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another reason to ignore the NFL media this off-season.  They&#8217;re all falling over themselves (and whipping out the thesaurus) in trying to out-superlative the next guy.</p>
<p>Hey, it was a fun game to watch.  Nothing else.    </p>
<p>Cannot wait for the Brett Favre watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/02/steeler-coronation#comment-9238</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=4275#comment-9238</guid>
		<description>In my last post, I think I got sidetracked from my larger point in all this, which is: it took a heck of a lot more success (3 Super Bowl in 4 seasons) by the Patriots before the media--even the local media--would give them the kind of credit and praise they&#039;re currently lavishing on this Pittsburgh team, which has won 2 in the last 4 years, not 3 out of 4, and has lost the only two post-season games they&#039;ve played against New England in this decade.

That was my main point, that the media seems to be jumping the gun on Pittsburgh, whereas with the Pats, they were going out of their way to be cautious about labeling them a dynasty, or whatever. It took that 3rd Super Bowl win, which made them only the 2nd team in history to win 3 out of 4, before the media committed to the notion that the Pats were a special team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my last post, I think I got sidetracked from my larger point in all this, which is: it took a heck of a lot more success (3 Super Bowl in 4 seasons) by the Patriots before the media&#8211;even the local media&#8211;would give them the kind of credit and praise they&#8217;re currently lavishing on this Pittsburgh team, which has won 2 in the last 4 years, not 3 out of 4, and has lost the only two post-season games they&#8217;ve played against New England in this decade.</p>
<p>That was my main point, that the media seems to be jumping the gun on Pittsburgh, whereas with the Pats, they were going out of their way to be cautious about labeling them a dynasty, or whatever. It took that 3rd Super Bowl win, which made them only the 2nd team in history to win 3 out of 4, before the media committed to the notion that the Pats were a special team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/02/steeler-coronation#comment-9237</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=4275#comment-9237</guid>
		<description>I understand that, but they&#039;ve lost both playoff games to the Pats this decade. That&#039;s what I meant by games that really meant something. I should have clarified that earlier.

I&#039;d also bring up the loser&#039;s lament that the Pats/Steelers game at Foxboro this season was very close in the first half (tied 10-10 at the half, I believe), and that the Pats dropped 2 or 3 passes that could have led to at least another 7, if not 10 points for them by halftime. True, the game got out of hand during the second half, but it largely turned into a rout after Slater dropped that kickoff at the Pats&#039; 1-yard line and it turned into a Pittsburgh TD two plays later.

Pittsburgh pretty much &quot;dominated&quot; only the second half in that game, and the Pats gave them a lot of help along the way.

They&#039;ve earned their championship this year and I&#039;m not trying to deny them anything, but for the media to suddenly anoint them as the next big thing (especially given the weak post-season schedule they faced this year) is a bit premature IMO.....remember, the Giants, Philly, Indy and Tennessee all beat Pittsburgh this year, and somehow the Steelers managed to avoid facing any of them a second time around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that, but they&#8217;ve lost both playoff games to the Pats this decade. That&#8217;s what I meant by games that really meant something. I should have clarified that earlier.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also bring up the loser&#8217;s lament that the Pats/Steelers game at Foxboro this season was very close in the first half (tied 10-10 at the half, I believe), and that the Pats dropped 2 or 3 passes that could have led to at least another 7, if not 10 points for them by halftime. True, the game got out of hand during the second half, but it largely turned into a rout after Slater dropped that kickoff at the Pats&#8217; 1-yard line and it turned into a Pittsburgh TD two plays later.</p>
<p>Pittsburgh pretty much &#8220;dominated&#8221; only the second half in that game, and the Pats gave them a lot of help along the way.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve earned their championship this year and I&#8217;m not trying to deny them anything, but for the media to suddenly anoint them as the next big thing (especially given the weak post-season schedule they faced this year) is a bit premature IMO&#8230;..remember, the Giants, Philly, Indy and Tennessee all beat Pittsburgh this year, and somehow the Steelers managed to avoid facing any of them a second time around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/02/steeler-coronation#comment-9236</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=4275#comment-9236</guid>
		<description>OK.  Cool.  Aside from that, Tony&#039;s right.  You got him, though.  The Steelers beat the Pats once in a game that counted.  I&#039;m still waiting for you to disassemble the rest of his argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK.  Cool.  Aside from that, Tony&#8217;s right.  You got him, though.  The Steelers beat the Pats once in a game that counted.  I&#8217;m still waiting for you to disassemble the rest of his argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/02/steeler-coronation#comment-9235</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=4275#comment-9235</guid>
		<description>&quot;Can these media guys ease up a little on glorifying the Steelers until they at least beat the Patriots in a game that counts?&quot;

Tony,
The Steelers dominated the Patriots at Gilette during the regular season. If the Patriots had won this &quot;meaningless because it was a regular season game&quot;, they would have made the playoffs. I&#039;m pretty sure this was a game that counted pretty big this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can these media guys ease up a little on glorifying the Steelers until they at least beat the Patriots in a game that counts?&#8221;</p>
<p>Tony,<br />
The Steelers dominated the Patriots at Gilette during the regular season. If the Patriots had won this &#8220;meaningless because it was a regular season game&#8221;, they would have made the playoffs. I&#8217;m pretty sure this was a game that counted pretty big this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

