<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Initial Thoughts on ESPNBoston.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/08/initial-thoughts-on-espnboston-com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/08/initial-thoughts-on-espnboston-com</link>
	<description>Watching The New England Sports Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:21:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/08/initial-thoughts-on-espnboston-com#comment-14701</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Coyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=6467#comment-14701</guid>
		<description>Has 890 moved to their new frequency yet?  A thought I had over the weekend when I heard that they were FINALLY going to improve their signal strength (in this case by moving to a new spot on the dial) was that the timing of this move underscores why that station was never able to get off the ground.  

If the station management at 890 made this move a year ago perhaps they could&#039;ve kept Felger (he doesn&#039;t go back to EEI) and that afternoon show takes off enough that they can build other local programming around it (like a local show for Russillo instead of him leaving for Bristol).  If that happens maybe CBS Radio decides not to flip BCN to sports because now it&#039;s that much harder for them to find a duo for afternoon drive.  Now Jessamy Tang and her pals are trying to expand their product after 98.5 has already gotten a foothold in Boston and I can&#039;t see this market--sports-starved as it is--supporting three sports radio stations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has 890 moved to their new frequency yet?  A thought I had over the weekend when I heard that they were FINALLY going to improve their signal strength (in this case by moving to a new spot on the dial) was that the timing of this move underscores why that station was never able to get off the ground.  </p>
<p>If the station management at 890 made this move a year ago perhaps they could&#8217;ve kept Felger (he doesn&#8217;t go back to EEI) and that afternoon show takes off enough that they can build other local programming around it (like a local show for Russillo instead of him leaving for Bristol).  If that happens maybe CBS Radio decides not to flip BCN to sports because now it&#8217;s that much harder for them to find a duo for afternoon drive.  Now Jessamy Tang and her pals are trying to expand their product after 98.5 has already gotten a foothold in Boston and I can&#8217;t see this market&#8211;sports-starved as it is&#8211;supporting three sports radio stations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/08/initial-thoughts-on-espnboston-com#comment-14697</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=6467#comment-14697</guid>
		<description>i wronder what kind of radio espn boston will have</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wronder what kind of radio espn boston will have</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/08/initial-thoughts-on-espnboston-com#comment-14607</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=6467#comment-14607</guid>
		<description>Generally, people who comment on articles are idiots. Except on this site, for some reason. The biggest idiots are the Lakers trolls on the Celtics Blog on boston.com. Everything they touch turns to suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, people who comment on articles are idiots. Except on this site, for some reason. The biggest idiots are the Lakers trolls on the Celtics Blog on boston.com. Everything they touch turns to suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guntfather of Sports Radio</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/08/initial-thoughts-on-espnboston-com#comment-14561</link>
		<dc:creator>Guntfather of Sports Radio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 01:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=6467#comment-14561</guid>
		<description>ESPN radio wants an outlet to at the very least run their morning show live and for 4 hours. They do that in New York, Chicago, Washington, and Philly if I&#039;m not mistaken. The ratings are mixed. WEEI would never go national during drive time. 985 might if Toucher and Rich&#039;s contracts don&#039;t get renewed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESPN radio wants an outlet to at the very least run their morning show live and for 4 hours. They do that in New York, Chicago, Washington, and Philly if I&#8217;m not mistaken. The ratings are mixed. WEEI would never go national during drive time. 985 might if Toucher and Rich&#8217;s contracts don&#8217;t get renewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: late to dinner</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/08/initial-thoughts-on-espnboston-com#comment-14559</link>
		<dc:creator>late to dinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=6467#comment-14559</guid>
		<description>Bruce et al,

If I were ESPN I would do one of three things in the Boston Market as it currently is the most profitable sports radio market in the country.

1) End the affiliation with ESPN 890 and reaffiliate with WEEI.  I do not think WEEI would think twice about dropping Fox Sports if only to get Gammons back on as a regular contributor.

2) Buy WEEI outright.  It may mean buying Entercom but to the bean counters that might not be as far fetched an idea as having virtually no presence in the market as they currently do.  They could then merge the WEEI.com business with their ESPNBoston.com business and they have instant credibility.

3) Buy an FM station with a good signal, and have a corporate run station rather than an affiliate.  Put on local programing from 10:00am until 6:00 pm.  Then slug it out with the other two.  

I think the most likely option is the alliance with WEEI in option 1.  Although it does not get Mike and Mike into the Boston market, the fact is they have no other block of programing that would compete against the local stuff here.  The issue is exposure. I think option 2 however makes the most sense if I were a bean counter.  We will see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce et al,</p>
<p>If I were ESPN I would do one of three things in the Boston Market as it currently is the most profitable sports radio market in the country.</p>
<p>1) End the affiliation with ESPN 890 and reaffiliate with WEEI.  I do not think WEEI would think twice about dropping Fox Sports if only to get Gammons back on as a regular contributor.</p>
<p>2) Buy WEEI outright.  It may mean buying Entercom but to the bean counters that might not be as far fetched an idea as having virtually no presence in the market as they currently do.  They could then merge the WEEI.com business with their ESPNBoston.com business and they have instant credibility.</p>
<p>3) Buy an FM station with a good signal, and have a corporate run station rather than an affiliate.  Put on local programing from 10:00am until 6:00 pm.  Then slug it out with the other two.  </p>
<p>I think the most likely option is the alliance with WEEI in option 1.  Although it does not get Mike and Mike into the Boston market, the fact is they have no other block of programing that would compete against the local stuff here.  The issue is exposure. I think option 2 however makes the most sense if I were a bean counter.  We will see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce, NV</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2009/08/initial-thoughts-on-espnboston-com#comment-14558</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce, NV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/?p=6467#comment-14558</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Bruce, but I think that the boston.com and herald comments pages give the lie to your comment about Schlereth and ESPN hyperbole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Bruce, but I think that the boston.com and herald comments pages give the lie to your comment about Schlereth and ESPN hyperbole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

