The Story That Would Not Die

(A guest column from George Cain.)

In the world of sports talk radio we are led to believe the narrative is dictated by the events of the sporting world and not by the hosts themselves. ”We only talk about what the callers want to talk about, Gerry.”  

But in reality, it is the hosts of the program, who fully control the narrative and the callers that follow.

In 2007, the Patriots marched through an undefeated regular season and two playoff games. Yet, all the media would talk about was Spygate. The run to perfection was pretty much an afterthought. It’s been awhile since one story has so dominated this local landscape. Fast forward to the present day, and we have the 2011 Boston Red Sox and the greatest collapse of all time.  Dan Shaughnessy claims that even Spygate wasn’t this big.

This is the team the Boston media refuses to stop talking about.  I say the Boston media, because the national media for the most part is moving on. I somewhat expected  the Red Sox story to take a back seat this week after Tom Brady’s thrilling game winning drive against the Dallas Cowboys.  But apparently fried chicken is a much sexier topic.

Now, let’s get this out-of-the-way: I am not naïve, the season was a historic, epic disaster.  The drama that has succeeded it is worthy of prolonged discussion.  I get that. Despite that, this story is being WAY overplayed. The New York Yankees, who somehow became the 2011 MLB underdogs despite 97 wins and a 200 million dollar payroll, followed the Red Sox right to the golf course or perhaps in some cases to Popeye’s.  And let’s not forget “The Most Storied Franchise In Sports©” lost a deciding Game five at HOME, to Doug Fister and the Detroit Tigers.

The Philadelphia Phillies won 102 games this year.  They were the odds-on favorite to win the World Series.  They were the team with the greatest starting pitching staff since the 1971 Baltimore Orioles; and they were bounced in the first round.  You could argue that their defeat was more impactful than the Red Sox collapse.  If the Red Sox had squeaked into the playoffs only to get bounced, would this story still have legs? Or is it just all about the deep fryer?

“Let’s not forget, we’re the real story.”  – Aaron Altman played by Albert Brooks from the movie Broadcast News.

That is a great line from a superb movie, and it couldn’t be more appropriate to describe John Henry’s appearance on 98.5 Friday and the subsequent aftermath on BOTH local radio stations.  I am waiting for the one-hour documentary on CSNNE, as if Woodward and Bernstein Felger and Mazz had just broken the Watergate story.

There is no doubt that John Henry’s “impromptu” appearance on the Sports Hub’s Felger and Mazz Show was big news.    It was great radio, it gave us some (a little?) new insight, it created talking points, buzz etc. I don’t blame Felger and Mazz for trying to squeeze some juice out of the story.  But, do you need every drop?

The interview has been played and replayed and dissected, and played again, and then later played on Felger’s CSNNE Sports Sunday show, and discussed on the radio all weekend.  At what point do we reach the tipping point? Sadly, that will not be until the hosts of these programs decide to move on. If they keep talking about it, people will keep calling in; it’s kind of a chicken and egg thing.

Monday on the Sports Hub, one of Tony’s opening comments was “This has nothing to do with us.”  No Tony, I think you’re wrong.  I think it has everything to do with you. Don’t misconstrue my point, I think that interview is still worthy of discussion today and throughout the next few months.  But, I don’t think it should be discussed ENTIRELY for the next few months. Can we mix things up even a little bit?

As far as the interview itself, I thought both sides had their moments. Felger was funny when discussing Josh Beckett’s obvious physical changes.  On the other hand, he sounded sophomoric when discussing David Ortiz running to first base. 

Henry was right on point when discussing his focus on the team.  Basically, Felger and Mazz had already talked this story so much to death prior to Henry’s appearance that they had reached the point where they were almost accusing John Henry of becoming “detached” from the team. Somehow, John Henry’s wife Linda Pizzuti had become Cleopatra or Yoko Ono and the entire Roman Empire was about to fall.  Incidentally, for the brief time I listened to WEEI on Monday they spent “Patriots Monday” on the same tired topic.  John Henry would be wise to sit down with Bill Belichick and Bob Kraft and learn a little about plugging leaks.  The Less is More Strategy, might infuriate the Ron Borges’ of the world, but it serves the Patriots pretty well.

Felger and Mazz, sometimes seem to dwell in their own little sports bubble.  Here’s a newsflash for Mike and Tony – sports owners usually don’t own just one business.  Yes, some do, but most have businesses in all sorts of industries and walks of life.  Some own TWO sports teams, can you believe that?  Mark Cuban owns his own production company.  How did the Dallas Mavericks ever win the NBA title?  He must be quite the multitasker.

For me, the Red Sox 2011 Soap Opera is starting to feel like a movie you’ve seen just one time too many. It reminds me of when TNT started showing “The Shawshank Redemption” everyday.

Don’t we all get the gist?  The Sox collapsed, the pitching stunk, and some pitchers drank beer and ate fried chicken while their teammates struggled to the finish line.  The manager lost control of the clubhouse and was either fired or quit.   That same manager was later smeared to the press by someone in the front office or on the team.  The Red Sox “Boy Wonder GM” is heading for greener pastures and taking his huge ego with him.  The Red Sox ownership is going to spend the next six months trying to restore their name. Whenever a Red Sox player does speak, like Jon Lester did yesterday, that interview is going to bring all of this up again, and their words will be examined as closely as the Zapruder film.     

I think I have it all, but if not, just tune into 98.5 and listen to the hosts pat themselves on the back and discuss it again and again and again and again……

About George Cain

From Woburn, MA, George has been an avid follower of the Boston sports scene (teams and media) for 30 years and has been a contributor to BSMW since 2009.

Feel free to send him your feedback in the comment section below, or ping him on Twitter at @GeorgeCain72

  • Classless

    "the chicken, the beer, the videogames,the chicken, the beer, the videogames,the chicken, the beer, the videogames,the chicken, the beer, the videogames,the chicken, the beer, the videogames,the chicken, the beer, the videogames,the chicken, the beer, the videogames,the chicken, the beer, the videogames,the chicken, the beer, the videogames,the chicken, the beer, the videogames."

    - Everyone at WEEI

  • Jose Gill

    Felger is going to cancel your phanclub membership George

  • oldskool138

    You lost me with the Theo hate at the end. The guy's in his late 30's. That's not a boy. And to call him (in essence) egotistical is flat out wrong. You could say that about just about any GM. You need brass cajones to be successful at that job…and Theo with his two WS ring has been just that in Boston. Successful. Something that his old cigar chomping predecessors hadn't been able to do for 86 years.

  • MrEdRomero

    The "expert" psychoanalytical and investigative interpretations of every John Henry and Jon Lester sentence by highly-esteemed scholars such as Andy Gresh and Lou Merloni has taught all sports personalities that they're better off not talking or always talking in cliches, rather than being honest or thoughtful..

  • Hank Durod

    I'm sorry, I don't follow the Red Sox anymore. DId something happen recently?

  • Mark

    Yes, move on. I'm finding myself changing the channel. I find the part about ownership a good one. Are radio hosts (particularly Felger and Mazz) ignorant about how these owners operate that they act shocked that Henry didn't say something sooner? Don't you think John Henry has nothing to do but dwell on the happenings with one of his businesses? I imagine an owner to be like Kraft in "A Football Life" . Just taking the pulse and relying on the people he's paying to worry about the details.

  • Dan Riley
  • bostonsportsmediafan

    "This is the team the Boston media refuses to stop talking about. I say the Boston media, because the national media for the most part is moving on."

    Good point here. The problem is that scandal + epic sports failure is like what a third positive drug test would mean to TMZ for Lindsay Lohan. And, I think it's with some justification. Every person I know who consumes sports radio or at least follows the teams here is still talking about this. Even when I spent the night in a sports bar for MNF, everyone was talking about this–the game being absolutely horrible did not help.

    "John Henry would be wise to sit down with Bill Belichick and Bob Kraft and learn a little about plugging leaks. "

    He would be. This entire incident is going to become a textbook example of how NOT to handle things. At this point, I'd hire a person who has previous ties to a White House because of how bad the situation is. Love or hate that, as someone said, they keep throwing gasoline on a fire that tries to go out.

    I do think it's getting a bit tiresome, but would you rather that something did not happen with Henry coming into anywhere and speaking or something being done? Unfortunately, I think this was the only way to get someone's attention.

  • PeterH

    I think also that their incessant "can you believe it" comments about the fact that John Henry admitted to not wanting to sign Crawford is an indication of the "bubble" these radio guys live in. Im most business settings, there is often disagreement over decisions and usually the "experts" (Theo and co) win out over seniority or ownership, at least that is my experience. So to presume there is "chaos in the organization" because JH disagreed with a baseball decision (note though JH disagreed, the Sox still did the deal) is a juvenile analysis of a business situation.

    • Lance_

      Peter,

      You should know there's nothing wrong with dissension – good organizations encourage honesty. Where he fumbled is making that known at this stage of the game. No halfway functional organization tells the public they wish they hadn't hired a certain employee. And in this case it comes across as another petty CYA move.

      I know he was making a point but he's dealt with the media long enough to know words and meaning get taken out of context all the time. It's why BB or anyone in the Patriots organization is not saying a bad word about Ochocinco. It's amazing no one in the Red Sox organization appears to be capable of giving a nice inoffensive soundbite.

      • PeterH

        Lance:
        I agree with what you are saying. JH should never had handed Felger that issue and certainly shouldn't have revealed his personal opinion of the deal (he may need to explain why he didn't like the deal to Carl – not that he didnt like Crawford as a player but that we already had enough left fielders (acc to JH)). My point was more that Felger (and apparently everyone else in the sports media in Boston) sees the very act of dissention as "chaos" when it is totally normal. They see it as some massive falling out of JH with the rest of the organization. That was my only point.

  • A. G. Lapierre

    Does anyone remember George Cain's Red Sox article from August that was ridiculed by a lot of people in the commentary boxes? Nostradamus aint got nothin' on that guy.

    • APimpNamedDaveR

      I remember it well. It was complete drivel then, and it is complete drivel now. Complaining about Darnell McDonald and Franklin Morales being on a team that's 20 games above .500 at the time it's written is garbage regardless of what happens afterwards. George's main argument was (a) the Sox should have pulled out every stop to beat the Yankees in a series in the first week of August while sitting on a comfortable lead in the division, and that they did not shows they "don't care about winning" (hmm…. nothing about beer in the clubhouse, or Francona losing the team in there….), and (b) the local media should be filled with condemnation over that. That's — pardon my French — uneducated bull****; the rantings of an entitled fan who would think a team that went 161-1 "didn't want to win enough". Garbage then, garbage now.

      However, George and the local media are working themselves into a frenzy over the wrong thing. The clubhouse drinking, etc. etc. etc. is completely irrelevant. It's not the story at all. The team failed because (a) they had a lot of injuries, and (b) their two ace pitchers pitched like crap for a month. That happens. Did the drinking/chicken/videogames add to that? Sure, probably, somewhat. But again, chicken & beer didn't stop Lester and Beckett from performing at Cy Young levels for the rest of the year. The problem is that this scenario arose to begin with.

      And that's on management and ownership. As Schilling said today, a clubhouse runs itself. The disciplinarian managers work only when the team buys into their systems — if a guy's going to ignore Tito, he's also going to ignore Jim Leyland or Dick Williams. Terry's style isn't the problem. The problem is that these guys could ignore or take advantage of him without repercussion. And that's a systemic problem, not a chicken & beer issue.

      What I don't hear anyone in the media talking about is the true issue: why didn't management/ownership see this? Why weren't leader-type players brought in? Why wasn't Francona supported more? The way you take care of guys who don't buy in was shown in "Moneyball" — the Yankees paid millions of dollars for David Justice to play against them…. you can do that just as easily with Josh Beckett or John Lackey. Only the price is different.

      But — and here's the worst part — instead of addressing the real problem, namely the managerial/ownership failure to construct a clubhouse well and/or recognize a poorly-built clubhouse, the owners chose to scapegoat the manager. Badly. And denigrate their own players, including players who actually attempted to show leadership (Carl Crawford). This is RAVING incompetence on the part of ownership, and a sign that they don't know, or don't care, how to run a good organization.

      THAT'S the story. And it's getting sandbagged by all the chicken & beer BS.

      And I bet that's just what Henry, Lucchino, et al. want.

      • George

        Obviously I was not privy to the chicken and beer but I spoke at length about the complacency of this team from the front office to the manager and to the players and that was the underbelly of this whole failure. It had nothing to do with 161-1 and everything to do with a failure to close. Just look how few comebacks this team had. Just like the bear that stuck it’s head in the honeypot one time to many.

      • bostonsportsmediafan

        Agreed on many.

        The big thing I'm wondering is why don't management or some of the senior guys on the team put a rest/end to this, even if it takes some "collusion" and "smoke and mirrors".

        At this point, there is a division among who wants to say/tell what, and the media will continue to exhaust their services–doing their job, I might add–to find whatever can be leaked. A good team/good management would stop this by sealing all leaks, placing a complete Patriots-like media blackout, and finally just admitting to whatever is known or having everyone on the same page.

        Everyone knows that great quote about it not being about the incident itself but the cover-up….

      • etak

        A freakin' men. And because Francona said it, he gets sandbagged worse than he would have otherwise.

      • oldskool138

        "hmm…. nothing about beer in the clubhouse, or Francona losing the team in there…."

        Right. There's no need for a negative story about the Sox when they were virtual locks for the playoffs in early August.

        The reporter who comes out with that story can forget about getting another quote from the players for the rest of the year, if not forever.

      • Frank

        Dave nails it. The real story is how this ownership team TRIED to do another hatchet job on someone on their way out the door. I stress tried because people have finally had enough of it, and are actually calling for them to sell the team. So we keep getting spoon fed ridiculous stories about chicken and beer. Wake up people, ownership is pulling some Jedi mind trick crap here. The longer this chicken and beer nonsense goes on, the more the Tito story dies.

        And if you really believe sports radio shows talk about what the callers want to talk about, try calling any local show and say you want to talk college football, and then wait for the click.

  • stevebevacqua

    Outstanding. Echoed my thoughts in a way I can't. Good job.

  • Pingback: Weak stream of rants: Tuesday « Mission Control

  • napatree

    The fascinating thing about this local media obsession is that the high level of indignation all of these show hosts and columnists have about these transgressions. You'd think the Sox organization had organized a Fenway puppy kicking day or something. It is amazingly manufactured outrage. Ordway has been ripping Henry since JH appreared on Felger and Mazz, entirely because he knows it hurts his diminishing ratings and his station, which is the sox flagship. How would you like to have your bais of morality and appropriate ethical behavior being determined by Gresh, Zo, Mutt, Merloni, D& C, Big O and the invisible host, Holley? Noone gets the redass better than the media when someone critizes them, yet, they will trot out the tired " you're a public figure" when they are basically libeling individuals…

  • bostonsportsmediafan

    New report from WHDH:

    On nights when they were not pitching, Beckett, Lester and Lackey would exit the dugout as early as the 6th inning, walk back to the clubhouse, and fill cups with Bud Light beer. They would then return to the dugout with cups of beer and drink while watching the game. It didn’t make a difference whether the Red Sox were winning or losing at the time and the practice became more frequent later in the 2011 season. One Red Sox employee said Beckett, Lester and Lackey appeared “bored on nights they weren’t pitching and this is how they entertained themselves.”

    Another Red Sox employee described the routine like this: “Beckett would come down the stairs from the dugout, walking through the corridor to the clubhouse and say ‘it’s about that time’. Becket was the instigator but Lester and Lackey were right behind him.

    Read more: http://www1.whdh.com/news/articles/sports/redsox/

    • oldskool138

      No because that story's been refuted by the pitchers and Larry.

  • latetodinner

    George:

    My simple question is why do you want this story to die? I think it is one of the most fascinating soap operas I have followed in years. Here is the team most of us have followed since we were little kids…in my case because my grandfather followed them when he was a kid…self destructing in front of our eyes. We have a club house in disarray, a manager who was out of touch, a GM with lust for another city, an out of touch owner concerned more about soccer, NASCAR and Lebron than he is the Red Sox, two competing radio stations, rumors about the captain adn the pretty sideline reporter, a surprise interview on the "enemy" station, and a player at the center of the story confirming the beer and chicken…oh and today we hear there was drinking not only in the clubhouse but on the bench. How can you ever want this story to end. I wake up each day looking forward to the next salacious detail. As a sports fan in Boston there is no way a Pats win is going to erase this story…its just too juicy.

    Dave R…awesome post…you put the blame mostly where it belongs…although I still think the GM and to a lesser extent the manager were also at fault. But the more I hear…the more I dislike John Henry, Larry Lucchino and Tom Werner.

    • oldskool138

      I think the word "surprise" should be the one in quotation marks.

  • Will

    I never listen to Felger and Mazz and I'm okay with that.

  • Whitey Bulger

    You seem more interested in the sizzle than the steak. And in this case, there isn't nearly as much steak as you think.

    If you want for stories that are completely unfounded, I'd suggest read the Enquirer. The rest of this is just so much faked media fury.

    • oldskool138

      Okay how do you explain Jon Lester's admission that there was, indeed, chicken eating and beer drinking during the clubhouse during games? These stories aren't fabrications.

      How else do you explain the Sox pitchers (especially Lester and Beckett) not being able to get out of the 5th or 6th inning in games in Sept when other team's less talented starting pitchers had no trouble going that long?

  • napatree

    The Ny DAILY NEWS baseball writer, Bill Madden, has pointed out several times in the past 2 weeks, that CC Sabbathia, the Yankee ace, who is about to opt out of his huge contract, to get a new huge contract gained more than 40lbs over the course of the season, after having come into camp in great shape… Obviously, this is a guy the Sox should sign because he's an ace, unlike those fat losers like Beckett..(sarcasm)

%d bloggers like this: