Who Were This Week’s Mediots?

Guest Column From George Cain

Once we got past the thrill of a Tom Brady-led last-minute comeback win over the Dallas Cowboys, it turned into another painful week for Boston sports fans. Starting right again on Monday, fans were subjected to endless Red Sox soap-opera babble on radio, TV and the internet.  

Before I get into the locals, I’ve got to comment on Bryant Gumbel’s  editorial during Tuesday night’s “Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel” on HBO.

Slavery was an unspeakable, horrible disgrace, which has and will forever scar this country. That is why Gumbel calling David Stern a “modern plantation overseer” is beyond revolting. It was pathetic, idiotic, and shouldn’t be rationalized, explained or overlooked.  NBA basketball players and their commissioner, David Stern all who are multi-millionaires, are not analogous with anything that has to do with SLAVERY, plantations or civil rights.  Bryant Gumbel, as an African-American should know that better than anyone.  Is he that desperate to become relevant in the media that he would stoop this low?  So forget who is responsible for the lockout, I am just talking the language.

The failure of the national media and some local stations (98.5) to criticize Gumbel was pathetic. (note: WEEI’s Big Show did spend time on this topic on Thursday.)  Gumbel’s lack of an unforgiving tone makes him as close minded as those he condemns.  Mike Francesa’s rationalizing of a double standard today is also not acceptable to me.  It seems every time someone tries to disparage a group or an individual in a public setting they resort to calling them Nazis, or in this case the worst kind of racist.  Take it from someone who works in the private sector, that stuff doesn’t fly in my world and it shouldn’t be tolerated any place else.

On the MUCH, MUCH, MUCH softer side of things, the Felger and Mazz show was insufferable this week. They continued harping on the Red Sox saga all week and by Friday they had turned it into Larry Lucchino vs The Sports Hub.  If this was a friend of yours talking you would have told them to shut up by now. Felger and Mazz are either very insecure or very arrogant.

Also on the Sports Hub – Tuesdays with Wiggy.  I like Jermaine Wiggins, but so far he’s not bringing much to the table.  Jermaine, I know you were there for some good times with the Patriots, but negativity is not an opinion. You have to have some facts, beyond and I am paraphrasing, “well if Dallas didn’t drop passes…..blah, blah,blah.”  In every NFL game teams on both sides drop passes, fumble, etc.  In the end, the better team usually makes the plays when they need to and we saw that this week.

This brings me to my media idiot of the week.  I have said in this space before I don’t care much for Tony Massarotti.   For years he’s always tried to get a seat at the big table playing the negative angle.  Hey, I don’t like hometown cheerleaders either, I think it contributed to the fall of the Big Show on WEEI, but being negative for the sake of negativity is not only boring, its lazy.

Case in point, Tony Mazz’s belittling of the Patriots wins over the Cowboys and Jets.  Mazz cited that the slightly improved Patriot defense had NOTHING to do with the Patriots and everything to do with the other teams.  There is nothing wrong with that opinion, but when you win it, it can’t be the fault of the other team and when you lose it, it can’t be your fault.  This has become more than a trend on the Felger and Mazz Show but a mantra.  John Henry might be right; Tony is an entertainer, playing a part, the part of the”Angry” talk show host. It’s beneath Tony and beneath the show. Don’t look now, but Felger and Mazz are starting to show the arrogance of success that we saw from Ordway and the crew for the last 10 years. 

In 2003, the Patriots were coming off a second place 9-7 season where they did not make the playoffs.   They were not a Super Bowl favorite, they were hardly an AFC East favorite, but that season they went 17-2 and won a Super Bowl.  The Patriots won 8 games by a touchdown or less, and won 3 games where they scored 12 points or less.  It was a different time with different rules, but the Patriots were a dropped/batted-down pass from going to OT against Tennessee in the first round.  My point, in a single elimination tournament, even teams with the slightest of flaws are vulnerable.

I have been as critical as anyone of this Patriot defense, but at this point you have to take the long view.  The Patriots face some really good QB’s (Roethlisberger, Eli Manning, Vick, Fitzpatrick) and some really bad ones (Moore, Beck, Tebow) in the next ten games.   If they win 11 or 12 games it won’t be ALWAYS because of the other team’s incompetence.   

So here’s to you Tony, my media idiot of the week;  you earned it!

About George Cain

From Woburn, MA, George has been an avid follower of the Boston sports scene (teams and media) for 30 years and has been a contributor to BSMW since 2009.

Feel free to send him your feedback in the comment section below, or ping him on Twitter at @GeorgeCain72

  • latetodinner

    George:

    With so many media idiots of the week to potentially choose from I am surprised you settled on Tony Mazz. All he was doing was parroting Kerry Byrnes position that the Pats have been lucky to be winning because their defensive passer rating is historically bad. As such Byrnes using his cold hard football facts (the validity of which is an argument for a different day) argued that the wins over Miami and Jets were flukes or unimpressive. Mazz was just following along with that argument my guess is because he was excited to have had Brynes on the show. Is it stupid yes was it mediot of the week stupid…well lets look at some other nominees and you tell me:

    - D and C for spending 20 minutes on the air humiliating an intern for losing $20 Gerry had given him to buy chicken.

    - Felger for actually believing that Larry Lucchino's comments were directed at him and him only. So much so that he and Tony launch into a rereading of the quotes where after every pause Mazz is heard whispering Felger's name.

    - Glenn Ordway being unwilling to mention name the place where John Henry gave his interview.

    - D & C for making it sound like the Bob Kraft interview was as much of a coup as the Henry one when Patriots Friday is a paid segment.

    - Mike Turico's on air defense of Bryant Gumble.

    - Dan Shaughnessey allowing himself to be used as Larry Lucchino's mouth piece yet again.

    My point is Mazz making a football point defended by a pretty knowledgable guy in Byrnes is not nearly the most egregious thing we heard on the radio this week. Your picking on him for this screams of bias towards Mazz.

    • George

      Legit points but Tony took it beyond Byrne’s analysis and he has been the voice of Patriot doom since the show began. Agree with you on Mike Tirico, based on what I read in the espn book he’s lucky he has a job today.

  • tl;dr

    Slavery doesn't have to always scar our country. Scars such as this can heal. So long as we let the issue "scar" our country some people are going to use it just like Gumble did. If we allow it to heal, it takes that card out of their deck so they can't play it and move on.

  • tl;dr

    And why would Gumble know about plantations? Does he have a time machine? I'm a white guy…do I know about the Crusades or ancient Rome? No. No I don't.

    • Tony

      I'm actually shocked that anyone is surprised by Gumble saying something like this. He said a very, very similar thing regarding Gene Upshaw and the NFLPA being submissive to the NFL owners a few years ago, and he said it in the same context of the "slavery" comment he made the other day about the NBA, without using the word slavery (the innotaion then was more in the "house negro" vein). If you've followed Gumble's career closely, in fact, you know that he's never been shy about dealing from the bottom of a deck of race cards whenever the whim hits him. That goes for his career as both a sports guy and a "news" guy on the Today Show.

      Completely unsurprised that he'd say something like that. It's what he does.

  • jlm

    I think Gumble may have overreacted but now everyone is talking about Real Sports. Hmm, see how that works.

    But I can't listen to Ordway when he starts to screech about race. Is there anyone who knows less about the subject than Ordway? Oh sorry there is and it's Dennis and Callahan.

  • mpc

    I'm not sure I understand the comments in Wiggins. "negativity is not an opinion". This was meant as irony, right?

    I like the guy, and I've heard him challenge F & M on any number of occasions. He's got strong opinions, can articulate them better the a Deossie or Smerland, and has a dry sense of humor.

    Your dislike of F & M is obvious, and considering how they polarize listeners understandable. I'm not certain that Wiggy isn't just guilty by association to you.

  • Lou from accounting

    T&R did bring up the Gumbel quote, yesterday, if memory serves well.

  • dan

    Tony Mazz has "small mans" complex. This little dweeb compensates for his small stature by acting like a jerk tough guy.

    • Norm

      I can’t stand Mazz either, but what the hell does his height have to do with anything? Are tall people excused from being a douche, soley due to their height? Dan, you must be a tall guy and the tone of your comment indicates you don’t seem to have too much else going for you.

  • Lou from accounting

    Correction, Thursday, between 7:20 and 7:30. They're no fans of Stern, but criticized Gumbels choice of words.

  • EvilStaceyJames

    Can I nominate George Cain or is this week's balloting closed?

  • bostonsportsmediafan

    Actually, the Red Sox did the right thing and changed the narrative. Agreed on the "lets stop". Will it happen? Nope. I begged on the Casey Anthony garbage for weeks and it only got worse. After the verdict, it was worse but then died down. Now? anyone besides the garbage on HLN cover this stuff? Nope.

    On another note: is it me or is Fred Smerlas .. off as an analyst? It seems like his breakdowns reflect generic points that have come from some of the papers in town or outlets that do Pats coverage. And, for some reason, if I keep the channel on for commercials, it always seems like the poorly-produced commercial for his bar/restaurant at one of the casinos is there. On the other hand, contrasting to Troy Brown and the other former Pat he usually appears with (forgot his name right now), they've grown into their roles well on CSNNE.

  • Winning_

    Ty LAw?

    • bostonsportsmediafan

      Winning_,

      That is him. I only had a small screen to type and couldn't switch at the time to google it without losing the post.

      For instance, tonight, Felger/GearBear were asking him in the segment about if the Jets win was a fluke or if they were back. We get the vanilla "well the QB isn't that good and the offense is still inconsistent … the defense has some holes in it" Felger goes on to question him about "So.. it's a one team race in the AFC East.. which you've been saying for the past 13 years". He makes a gesture and wants to detract what he just said as if Felger is kinda wondering if that's all he means or if that's it.

      I think this summarizes what I was trying to talk about here. Did CSNNE hire him to be a Pats cheerleader? I think they already have quite a few of these. I don't think Boston needs another Felger but it seems like even some of the "weaker" analysts who cover the Pats here and abroad can come up with something better than this.

      • George

        Smerlas was particularly bad. Felger likes to push the Jets because he knows it annoys the Patriot fan. Smerlas tries to be objective but then loses his train of thought it seems and becomes a fan boy.

  • pastabelly

    George, I am pretty sure that Dennis & Callahan devoted a segment to Gumball's remarks.

%d bloggers like this: